Copying to learn?
I’ve been going through one of my Kraftwerk appreciation phases of late and watching a few videos on Youtube.
One of them was an interview with Karl Bartos, where he actually said that if you like a style and sound, you should copy it – at first exactly or as closely as possible, then after a while your style will move away from “copying” and evolve into your own style.
First off, I was a bit surprised that anyone from Kraftwerk would say that – they were reasonably original – and secondly I saw the parallel with photography. the old cliche we live by is that noting is completely original, we’re all influenced somehow etc. but is copying very closely wise?
Well I never subscribed to that point of view, the reason being that you end up with a shot that is very very similar to one that has already been taken. The one you copied. I still think that copying to get a useable end product isn’t a good way to go, but as a learning tool Karl may well have a point.
Like may things that seem pointless, such as going for an LRPS, it’s not the end result that counts so much as what you learn on the way. My mate Mac did his LRPS and I was slightly amused by it all – he has lots of qualifications so it was very “him” to do it. But when I was at his place, he showed me his “panel”, a set of shots that were judged, and I saw the effort he’d been to to print, mount and arrange the shots – sort of changed my mind a bit, though I’m not going to start putting together my own panel very soon.
I’ve purposely strayed away from copying, I very rarely look at other people’s photography , preferring to annoy people on photography forms, but I may start taking a look at other work and seeing if I can think how to re-create the shot. May just learn something, or find some glaring holes in my skillset on the way!


















Panasonic are announcing a